IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 20 of 2025 Date of Decision: 1.12.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Mohinder Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Rohan Tomar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on instructions dated 29.11.2025, issued under the signature of Executive Engineer HPPWD Division Kotkhai, enclosing therewith communication dated 26.9.2025 issued by the Under Secretary (PW) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, thereby conveying the decision of the Government to implement the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, learned Additional Advocate General states that the mandate passed by this Court has been complied with. 2 2. Having perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated, government has now decided to issue notification under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, subject to the outcome of the LPA. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of, however, directions are issued to the respondents to ensure that notification under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act is issued expeditiously, preferably, within two weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken against implementation and execution of judgment sought to be executed. December 1, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge