Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34765 (PAT)

Ranjit Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./23882/2025 · 2025-05-06

Chandra Shekhar Jha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23882 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar S/o Ram Briksh Singh R/o Village- Kewalpatti, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 89 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 135 litres of IMFL/country made liquor from the motorcycle. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel that petitioner implicated with present case only being registered owner of motorcycle bearing registration no. BR32H0753, which was found involved in carrying of illicit liquor as alleged. It is submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23882 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 admittedly no recovery was made from the physical possession of the petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not appears to be made from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd cum Special Judge Excise Act, Madhubani/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 89 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. veena/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T