1 2025:CGHC:40688 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 779 of 2025 1 - Smt. Rama Sahu Wd/o Late Eshwar Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Padampur Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 2 - Miss Priyanka Sahu D/o Late Eshwar Sahu Aged About 17 Years Minor Represented Through Appellant No. 01 Smt. Rama Sahu (Mother), R/o Village Padampur Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 3 - Deepak Sahu S/o Late Eshwar Sahu Aged About 2 Years Minor Represented Through Appellant No. 01 Smt. Rama Sahu (Mother), R/o Village Padampur Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Amrika Bai W/o Sukhram Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Padampur Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 5 - Sukhram Sahu Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Padampur Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Applicants versus 1 - Omprakash Agrawal S/o Basant Agrawal Aged About 60 Years R/o Block Road Takhatpur Tahsil Takhatpur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh (Employer) 2 - The Branch Manager Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Old Bus Stand Opposite Rajeev Plaza Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh (Insurance Co.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicants : Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.08.14 10:45:25 +0530 2 Order on Board 13/08/2025 1. Heard on M.C.C., application for restoration of M.A.(C) No.732/2020, which was dismissed vide order dated 23.06.2025 for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that on 23.06.2025, counsel appearing for the applicants was engaged in another Court, thus, he could not appear when the case was taken up for hearing, therefore, the same was dismissed for want of prosecution. Hence, the said mistake was bonafide and the applicants wants to contest the case on merits, thus the instant MCC may be allowed. 3. Prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant is not opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, instant MCC is hereby allowed. 5. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to restore MA(C) No.732/2020, (Smt. Rama Sahu and Others vs. Omprakash Agrawal and another) in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi