CHUTTU SILAUNIYA @ SAURABH KUMAR JAIN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/8384/2021 · 2025-09-08
Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34764 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34764 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8384 of 2021 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, as such, the present writ petition has become infructuous. He has further submitted that against the said charge-sheet, Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 24202 of 2023 was also preferred, which too has been decided by this Court. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 9, 2025 Subham Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nanhe Lal Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Chuttu Silauniya @ Saurabh Kumar Jain .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBHAM KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad