Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3476 (KAR)

USHA W/O KUSHALCHANDRA JAIN v. JANA SWALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED

WA/100065/2025 · 2025-02-01

Ashok S Kinagi, Umesh M Adiga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2035-DB WA No. 100065 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA WRIT APPEAL NO. 100065 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. USHA W/O. KUSHALCHANDRA JAIN, AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE. 2. SHRI. KUSHALCHANDRA S/O. BABULAL JAIN, AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, BOTH ARE R/O. H. NO.216, KOLI PETH, MARATHA GALLI, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED, BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, MR. RAGHAVENDRA G. GROUND, MEZZANIRE, Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2035-DB WA No. 100065 of 2025 1ST FLOOR, UNKAL VILLAGE, VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580021. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, HUBBALLI TOWN, HUBBALLI DIST. DHARWAD-580021. 3. BENDIGERI TOWN POLICE STATION, BY POLICE INSPECTOR, DIST. DHARWAD-580021. 4. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, LAND RECORDS, HUBBALLI TOWN, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580021. 5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, HUBBALLI TOWN, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580021. …RESPONDENTS (BY MISS. GAYATRI S. R, ADV. FOR R1) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.01.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.100273/2025 ALLOWING THE WRIT APPEAL. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2035-DB WA No. 100065 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. 2. Submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending IAs, do not survive for consideration and are accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE SKS