HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 5088 of 2025 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohan Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Achal Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Gaon Sabha. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order of respondent no.2, dated 28.10.2025 arising out of proceeding under Section 20 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that out of his original holding a single chak was allotted to him on plot no.227M and 229M. The said allotment remain intact till the stage of Settlement Officer Consolidation. However, in a revision filed by respondent nos. 5 and 6, the chak allotted to the petitioner comprising his original holding in plot nos. 227 and 229 has been modified. Submission is that the petitioner, who is chak-holder plot no.175 has been affected by the order under challenge, as the order under challenge has been passed without considering the objection filed by him, before respondent no.2. It is also submitted that for the benefit of contesting respondents, the chak allotted to the petitioner on his original holding has been modified to his disadvantage, therefore, the order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation is unsustainable and liable to be set aside. 4. I have considered the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 5. The CH Form-23 relating to petitioner, filed as Annexure-6, to the writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohan Yadav, Shiv Badan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Achal Singh, C.S.C. Bhoop Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) petition shows that the petitioner was original tenure holder of plot nos. 228, 229, 222, 224, 225, 226 and 227. By the order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation, the revisionist has been accommodated by giving his chak on his original holdings, however, valuation of Rs.13.83 paisa has been taken out from the petitioner's alleged chak from plot no.227, in respect of which, he has been given equal valuation in plot nos. 228 and 229, which are contiguous plots. 6. The aforesaid adjustment shows that the petitioner's single chak has not been disturbed, he still possesses a single chak comprising of plot nos. 227, 228 and 229. Therefore, the perusal of amended chart alongwith CH Form -23 Part-I shows that there is a slight shifting of the chak of petitioner from his original possession, which has not materially affected him. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not show any prejudice having been caused to the petitioner by the said modification in the original chak allotted to him. 8. In view of the aforesaid and considering the adjustment made in the chak of petitioner by the order of respondent no.2, dated 28.10.2026, no prejudice has been caused to the petitioner, as such, no interference is warranted by this Court in the present petition. 9. The writ petition lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. September 14, 2026 Ashok Kr. WRIB No. 5088 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad