Ci^, Ai’HC010S41882017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17966 OF 2017 Between: R.R.Patrudu, S/o. Late Appalanaiadu, aged; 59 years, Occ: Sr. Assistant, at GPCM Society G.K.Veedhi R/o. Narsipatnem Village & Mandal Visakhapatnam District. A.P. State. 2. J. Konda, S/o. Late China Ramulu, aged; 59 years, Occ; Jr. Assistant, at GPCM Society G.K.Veedhi R/o. Narsipatnem Village & Mandal Visakhapatnam District. A.P. State. 3. B.Radha Krishna, S/o. Kondababu, Aged; 59 years; Occ; Working L.V.Driver, at G.P.C, Society, Paderu, R/o. Paderu Village & Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4. Ch.Ramabhadra Raju, S/o. Appala Raju, aged; 50 years, Occ; Sr. Assistant, at Divisional office GCC Ltd, R Chodavaram R/o. R Chodavaram Village & Mandal East Godavari District. A.P. State. 5. G.K.Narayana Murthy, S/o. Bhashyakarlu, Aged; 59 years; Occ; Senior Assistant/ working as accountant, GCM Society, P.Doranala, Prakasam Distict, R/o. Simhadripuram, Korlagunta Post, Musunuru Mandal, Krishna District. 1. as ...Petitioners AND wz 1. Girijan Co-Operative Corp Ltd Visakhapatnam, O/o. Opp Uda Park Visakhapatnam City & District, A.P State Rep by its, Vice Chairman - cum Managing Director. 2. Girijan Co- Operative Corporation Ltd, Visakhapatnam, O/o. Opp Uda Park Visakhapatnam City & District, A.P State Rep by its. General Manager (Admn.) 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its PrI. Secretary Tribal welfare Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to retire the petitioners at the age of 58 years instead of 60 years is contrary to the provisions of Act. 4 dated 27th June, 2014 and contrary to the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice, violative of Article 14,16,19 and 21 of Constitution of India, and against the service rules and consequently to direct the Respondents to continue/ induct the petitioners up to 60 years of age re- lA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 4521 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted in WPMP No.21933/2017 in WP No. 17966/2017, 07.06.2017 and dismiss the WP and to pass _IA NO: 2 OF 2017fWPMP 21933 OF 2017^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue / re-induct the petitioners in service beyond 58 years of age and till they attains the age of 60 years in accordance with provisions of Act 4 dated 27-06-2014 and the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 2: P VV SATYANARAYANA (SC FOR GIRIJAN C O) Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) The Court made the following order: APHC010541862017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17966/2017 Between: R.r.patrudu, Visakhapatnam Dist & 4 Others and Others AND Vccummd Girijan Coop Corp Ltd Visakhapatnam 2 0th and Others Counsel for the Petltioner(S):' 1 CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) 2. SC FOR GIRIJAN C O The Court made the following ORDER: ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT{S) At the time of considering the matter, M.S.P Reddy, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events in the lis, the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication. 2. Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTYREGISTRAR 'W Section officer //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to SRI CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] One CC to SRI P VV SATYANARAYANA (SC FOR GIRIJAN C O) Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 3. 4. GSG V HIGH COURT DATED: 25/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 17966 OF 2017 DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS