HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3112 of 2025 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J. 1. The matter has been taken up on the mentioning of Shri Amrit Shanker Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Shri Dubey informs the Court that the petitioner has not complied with the terms of the order dated 19.05.2025 and has, in fact, been enjoying the benefit of the order dated 22.05.2025, whereby a no-coercive order was passed. He further submits that he had duly informed learned counsel for the petitioner about the mentioning of this case through WhatsApp, and in this regard, he has produced a printout evidencing receipt of the said communication. 3. Despite having due intimation, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition. 4. In these circumstances, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 9, 2025 Anil K. Sharma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sukrampal, Tikendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amrit Shanker Dubey, G.A., Himanshu Singh, Jitendra Kumar Saroj (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Safik @ Safik Hussain And Another .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad