Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34739 (JHR)

CHANDRIKA SAW ALIAS BUDHAN SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6625/2025 · 2025-11-25

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:35191 1 A.B.A. No. 6625 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 6625 of 2025 ---- Chandrika Saw @ Budhan Saw, aged about 30 years, son of Talebar Saw, r/o Village Bagodih, Murchatand, PO Bigodih, PS Saria, District Giridih, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Ravi Bhushan Sinha, Advocate For the State :- Mrs Ruby Pandey, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Uttam Kumar Das, Advocate ---- 2/25.11.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Saria P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 304, 324(4), 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and informant side are agnates and the altercation took place due to land dispute. He submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. He next submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. He then submits that co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.6604 of 2025. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of making assault. 5. Considering that both the sides are agnates and there are case and counter case between them and further there are general and omnibus 2025:JHHC:35191 2 A.B.A. No. 6625 of 2025 allegations and it has been pointed out by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.6604 of 2025, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender/ arrest, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Saria P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 25.11.2025 SI/