IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2534 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Abhishek Choudhary …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, pay of the petitioner has been refixed, but arrears have not been paid. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that arrears, if any, shall be released expeditiously in favour of the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within two months from today, 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 12, 2025 (sunil)