SURENDER KUMAR PHUTELA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/6862/2023 · 2025-04-08
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34732 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34732 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-6862-2023 (O & M) Date of Decision: 08.04.2025 Surender Kumar Phutela and others
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another
....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. S.S. Sahu, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik and Mr. Divyanshu Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that instant petition has rendered infructuous.
2.
Dismissed as infructuous.
3.
Pending application(s) also stand disposed of.
08.04.2025
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani
JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking
Yes Whether reportable
No Shivani Gupta 2025.04.08 17:55