BAL KRISHAN AND OTHERS v. DR.Y.S.PARMAR UNIVERSITY
EX.P./1285/2025 · 2025-10-29
Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia, Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34729 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34729 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:HHC:36095 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Petition Nos.1285 & 1229 of 2025
Decided on: 29th October, 2025
Ex. Petition No.1285 of 2025
Bal Krishan and others
.......Petitioners
versus
Dr.Y.S. Parmar University and another ...Respondents
Ex. Petition No.1229 of 2025
Punnu Ram and others
.......Petitioners
versus
Dr.Y.S. Parmar University
...Respondent
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S.Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Ramesh Chand Sharma, Advocate for the respondent- Y.S. Parmar University.
Mr.Govind Korla, Additional Advocate General for respondent-State.
G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral)
Counsel for respondent-Y.S. Parmar University has placed on record order dated 28.10.2025, wherein the benefit of judgment in Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025 titled as
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
( 2025:HHC:36095 ) 2
State of H.P. and others vs. Surajmani and another has been awarded by granting necessary work charge status on notional basis from various date(s) ranging from 01.01.2001 till 01.01.2006. Similar order for 48 petitioners has also been passed, which pertains to the execution petition arising out of Punnu Ram’s case.
2.
Keeping in view the pro-active steps taken by the University, let necessary pay fixation be also carried out within a period of two months from today.
3.
Resultantly, both the execution petitions are closed.
( G.S. Sandhawalia )
Chief Justice
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) October 29, 2025
Judge
(naveen)