APHC010539592024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 1350/2025 Between: 1. SAAVU GEETHA, W/O ACHUTARAO, AGED ABOUT 35, PROCESS SERVER (UNDER SUSPENSION), CIVIL JUDGE'S COURT, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARAVATI, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTARAR (ADMN)., AMARAVATHI. 2. PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, , VIZIANAGARAMDISTRICT. 5. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, SENIOR CIVIL JUDGES COURT, VIZIANAGARAM, DISTRICT. 6. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT COURT, VIZIANAGARAM, DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in 2 the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order in P.R. No. 78/2024-A dated 10/10/2024 (Departmental Enquiry against the petitioner) issued by the 2nd Respondent ordering departmental enquiry against the petitioner and suspending the petitioner for a period of six months without any notice and without conducting any Preliminary inquiry, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural justice and violation of A.P.C.C.A Rules 1991 and Article 21 of the constitution of India and consequently, to set aside the orders of the 2nd Respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the proceedings in P.R. No. 78/2024-A dated 10/10/2024 (Departmental Enquiry against the petitioner) issued by the 2nd respondent, while reinstating the petitioner into service forthwith and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G U R C PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y N VIVEKANANDA 3 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Sri G.U.R.C. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition as the petitioner has been reinstated into the service. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J. _________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J. Date: 02.09.2025 BSM 4 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.1350 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Date: 02.09.2025 BSM