Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51644 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10404 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramayan Yadav Respondent :- Employee S Provident Fund Commissioner Provident Fund House And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Swapnil Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Jagdish Pathak Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard Sri Swapnil Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Satyajeet Mukherjee, learned counsel for the respondent No.1/Employees' Provident Fund Commissioner, Lucknow. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the following prayer:- I. Issue nature a writ, order or direction in the of respondent No. mandamus commanding the 1 (Employee's Provident Fund Commissioner) to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner (make payment of provident fund etc. as contained in representation dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure No. 5 to this writ petition) 3. It is very fairly argued by Sri Satyajeet Mukherjee, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 that insofar as the role of the respondent No.1 is concerned, he is only responsible for payment of pension to the petitioner and in case, the petitioner will submit appropriate application in prescribed proforma, if any, before the respondent No.1, he will take a decision in the matter expeditiously. 4. In response to the same, learned counsel for the petitioner will submit the application for payment of pension before respondent No.1. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit appropriate application for payment of pension before respondent No.1. In case, the petitioner do so, the respondent No.1 will take a decision the matter expeditiously. Order Date :- 9.4.2025/saqlain Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad