Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6024] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15789/2024
1. Hasim S/o Dulla Miya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Munpur Karmala, Police Station Naugawan, District Alwar. 2. Kasim S/o Dulla Miya, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Munpur Karmala, Police Station Naugawan, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/02/2025
1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. filed on behalf of the petitioners, who are having apprehension of arrest in F.I.R. No. 374/2024 registered at Police Station Naugawan, District Alwar (Rajasthan) for offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate for which the maximum sentence is seven years. According to the allegations levelled in the FIR, some amount was deposited by the son-in-law of the complainant in the account of petitioner Hasim and Hasim refused to give the said amount to the complainant. Counsel submits that these allegations do not constitute any criminal offence. There are no criminal antecedents against the
[2025:RJ-JP:6024] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15789/2024] petitioners and custodial interrogation would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned State Counsel opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner and further considering the allegations levelled against the petitioners in the FIR; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners as per order of rejecting bail passed by the learned court concerned, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.
The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Naugawan, District Alwar (Rajasthan) in F.I.R. No.374/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- Hasim S/o Dulla Miya and Kasim S/o Dulla Miya, they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise
[2025:RJ-JP:6024] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15789/2024] to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J PCG/241