Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:26453
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3388 of 2019 1 – Kamal Kumar Kejriwal S/o Late Shri K.M. Agrawal, Aged About 49 Years R/o Civil Lines, Nh- 43, Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Satyanarayan Kejriwal S/o Late Shri K.M. Agrawal Aged About 59 Years R/o Civil Lines, Nh - 43, Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Shilpa Kejriwal W/o Late Shri Pawan Kejriwal Aged About 40 Years R/o Civil Lines, Nh - 43, Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantalaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Road, Transport And Highways, New Delhi 3 - Commissioner (Revenue) Bilaspur Division, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Korea, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) -Cum- Land Acquisition Officer Manendragarh,
District
:
Koriya
(Baikunthpur),
Chhattisgarh 6 - National Highway Authority Of India Through Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (National Highway), Ambikapur Division, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Sub-Divisional Officer Public Works Department, National Highway Sub- Division Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 8 – Tahsildar, Manendragarh District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh
... Respondents Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2 For Petitioners : Mr. Yogesh Netam, Advocate For Respondents No. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 & 8 For Respondent No. 2 : : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Central Government Counsel Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 20/06/2025
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous.
2. No objection from other side.
3. Recording the statement made by Mr. Yogesh Netam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti