Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34705 (CHH)

LAKHAN LAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6917/2019 · 2025-09-02

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45117 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6917 of 2019 1 - Lakhan Lal S/o Shri Nanki Ram Suryawanshi Aged About 46 Years Village And Post Khokhra, Tahsil Jangir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Technical Education, Naya Raipur Chhattisgah, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector District- Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Principal Government Polytechnic, Jangir, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Leekesh Kumar, Adv. for the petitioner. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amardeep Singh, PL (Hon’ble Mr. Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J) Order on Board 03/09/2025 1. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs :- 10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record. Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2025.09.06 12:05:04 +0530 2 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari to quash order dated 28.12.2018 (Annexure P/3) in the interest of justice. 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent authorities to allow petitioner to work in the institution in the interest of justice. 10.4 That this Hon'ble court may be further pleased to pass any other consequential and other orders/ writs which this Hon'ble court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application before concerned Labour Court. 3. Above prayer is not opposed by learned State Counsel. 4. On due consideration, prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. He is permitted to withdraw this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the liberty as sought for. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Pathak