IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 Rati Ram Yadav Rajender Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Constitution of India is for setting aside the order dated (Annexure P suffered a statement that he had compromised the matter. to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to the petitioner to with law. 24.03.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1 Date of Decision: Rati Ram Yadav Versus Rajender Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Manisha Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the order dated (Annexure P-7) whereby it has been recorded that the suffered a statement that he had compromised the matter. After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, in accordance Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. .03.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1740-2025 Date of Decision: 24.03.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the order dated 25.04.2024 7) whereby it has been recorded that the petitioner/JD suffered a statement that he had compromised the matter. fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty take recourse to the appropriate remedy, in accordance with the liberty aforesaid. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the 25.04.2024 petitioner/JD fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty take recourse to the appropriate remedy, in accordance RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.25 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.