Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10654-DB RP No. 495 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REVIEW PETITION NO. 495 OF 2024 IN R.F.A.No.1417 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1.
M. RAMANJANEYA @ RAMANJINI S/O MUNIANJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT MARUTHI NILAYA, GEDDALAHALLI, RMV II STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 094.
2.
M. RAMAMURTHY.
S/O. MUNIANJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.151, AKSHATH NIVAS, GEDDALAHALLI, RMV II STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 094. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. P. KULKARNI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K. M. VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
R. VISHNU S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,.
Digitally signed by KORLAHALLI BHARATHIDEVIKRISHNACHARYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10654-DB RP No. 495 of 2024
R/AT NO.262/A, IST MAIN, ASHWATHNAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 094. …RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W
ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN R.F.A. NO.1417/2017 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT RENDERED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN RFA NO. 1417/2017 ON 01.10.2024 BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AS PRAYED FOR THEREIN AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M. ADIGA)
Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the review petitioners.
2. The grounds made out in the review petition does not show that there is any error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment passed by this Court in RFA.No.1417/2017, dated
01.10.2024. Most of the grounds are pertaining to an appeal to be filed against the above said judgment. On such grounds, the appeal cannot be reheard on merits. There are no grounds to review the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10654-DB RP No. 495 of 2024
judgment. There are no errors in the judgment passed by this Court. Therefore, review petition is not maintainable.
Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
(SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR) JUDGE
Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE
bk/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 : CT:PH