Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3469 (PNJ)

RAJENDER KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/15264/2026 · 2026-03-20

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-15264 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 128 RAJENDER KUMAR STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to respondents No.4 and 5 in a case arising out of FIR No.373 dated 11.10.2025, under Section 127(6) 2023, Police Station Sadar Sirsa, District Sirsa. 2. petitioner before the respondent No. stipulated time. 15264-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH RAJENDER KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for Mr. Jagjit Singh Gill, Advocate Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to respondents No.4 and 5 in a case arising out of FIR No.373 dated 11.10.2025, under Section 127(6) and 108 Police Station Sadar Sirsa, District Sirsa. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the r has filed the representation dated 28.10.2025 the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15264-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 20.03.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. as been filed by the petitioner to take action as per law against the respondents No.4 and 5 in a case arising out of FIR No.373 dated and 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Police Station Sadar Sirsa, District Sirsa. sel representing the petitioner submits that the dated 28.10.2025 (Annexure P earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for against the respondents No.4 and 5 in a case arising out of FIR No.373 dated Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, sel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-5) earned counsel prays for directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within a GAURAV THAKUR 2026.03.23 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-15264 3. State is hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No. be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own level. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 15264-2026 (O&M) 8587 Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with o merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No. be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 to respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana Hence service of notice upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with o merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own :Yes/No : Yes/No upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own GAURAV THAKUR 2026.03.23 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document