IN THE HI 208-A Vija Kumar State Bank o CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP that the pres the entire dis appellants, th rendered infr 15.02.2025 rishu E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H RSA Date o umar and another Versus ank of Patiala and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Arun Jindal, Advocate for t Ms. Manvi Arora, Advocate for I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) At the very outset, learned coun e present Regular Second Appeal has tire dispute stands settled between the It is accordingly, prayed b , the instant second appeal may b ed infructuous. Ordered accordingly. 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1515-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.02.2025 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA te for the appellants. ate for the respondents. d counsel for the parties are ad idem al has been rendered infructuous as en the parties. ed by learned counsel for the may be disposed of as, having been ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No s as the een RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.17 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.