Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34685 (AP)

G VENKATA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28264/2023 · 2025-07-24

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010538832023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28264/2023 Between: 1. G VENKATA RAO, , S/O LAKSHMI PATHI, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC. SUPERINTENDENT, 0/O DISTRICT INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION OFFICE, NARASARAOPET, PALANADU DISTRICT. R/ O D . NO . 12 - 7-172, GANESWARA RAO STREET, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION (INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, , INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI V VANKATA RAMANA, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC. SUPERINTENDENT, 0/O REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, GUNTUR REGION, SAMBASIVAPETA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Memo dated 02.06.2023 issued by the 1st respondent, through which adjusting the Aided Absorbed Employee in D.V.E.O. Pool by posting the party respondent No.3, who belong to Zone-II in the only one existing vacancy meant for Zone-III on temporary basis and 2 stating that he will be readjust in his Zone-II as and when the vacancy arise and further declare the action of the official respondents in issuing impugned transfer order dated 02.06.2023 and the consequential communication proceedings dated 03.07.2023, which were issued during ban on transfers as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, unfair, contrary to law, contrary to very transfer rules issued by the Government and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set-aside the impugned transfer order dated 02.06.2023 in respect of party respondent No.3 is concerned and direct the respondents to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for transfer in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for transfer while readjusting the party respondent No.3 to his original Zone-II, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned transfer order dated 02.06.2023 issued by the 1st respondent Government in respect of party respondent No.3 is concerned, who was adjusted in Zone-III from Zone-II, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V L MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. D V S LOKESWARA RAO 2. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.28264 of 2023 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed questioning the Memo dated 02.06.2023 issued by the Respondent No.1 through which adjusting the Aided Absorbed Employee in D.V.E.O. Pool by posting the party Respondent No.3, who belong to Zone-II in the only one existing vacancy meant for Zone-III on temporary basis and stating that he will be readjust in his Zone-II as and when the vacancy arise and further declare the action of the official respondents in issuing impugned transfer order dated 02.06.2023 and the consequential communication proceedings dated 03.07.2023 which were issued during ban on transfers as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the passage of time, no cause survives in the present writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY,J Date: 25.07.2025 SCS 4 160 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28264/2023 DATE:- 25.07.2025 SCS