Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010541272022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Chakali Ragappa and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SHAKE ABDUL AZEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. K SITA RAM The Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that cause in this writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
RR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 33073/2022 Chakali Ragappa and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
SHAKE ABDUL AZEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): made the following:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that cause in this writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as . There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that cause in this writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI