IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2526 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Shri Lakhan Pal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 12.11.2025 passed by Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Kullu, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, has been complied with and higher pay scale has been granted to the petitioner in terms of judgment passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024, titled as Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General, as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid compliance, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within two months from today, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 12, 2025 (sunil)