Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:78289-DB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ***** (Sl No.64) Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9310 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dharmesh Nagar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lal Chandra Pandey,Om Prakash Chaurasia,Ram Sewak,Sudhanshu Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,C.S.C.,Vineet Pandey Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. The case of the petitioner is that his land was acquired by the respondents. The petitioner has been allotted 6% developed land. The petitioner, however, claims allotment of 10% developed land in terms of Full Bench judgement and order dated 21.10.2011 in Gajraj Singh and Others vs. State of U.P. and others; 2011 (11) ADJ 1 (FB).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that the petitioner had not challenged the acquisition proceedings and therefore, the direction for allotment of 4% additional land would not be applicable. However, it is submitted that the Development Authority had allotted 10% developed land to other co-sharers and therefore, on ground of parity the petitioner is also claiming additional 4% developed land. The representation filed by the petitioner in this behalf dated 31.01.2025 is stated to be pending.
3. Sri Vineet Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent - Authority states that the representation would be
decided by the respondent no. 2 within such time, as may be granted by this Court.
4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 31.01.2025 by speaking order within eight weeks from the date of communication of instant order along with photocopy of the representation. Order Date :- 13.5.2025 Shubham Arya (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad