Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34669 (CAL)

ABDULLAH AL-MAHMUD v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/18495/2021 · 2025-01-07

Biswajit Basu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ML47 January2025 sandip Ct. 19 07.01.2025 In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction W.P.A. 18495 of 2021 Abdullah Al-Mahmud Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sahid Uddin Ahmed, Mr. Md. Nizamuddin Molla … For the petitioner. Mr. Sadhan Kr. Halder, Mr. Abdus Salam … For the State. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner be kept with the record. The petitioner is alleging that the private respondents have put up a construction by encroaching upon the land belonging to the Public Works Department (P.W.D); thereby, has caused obstruction in the ingress and egress to his house; he is praying removal of the said structure. A report was called for from the Block Land & Land Reforms Officer, Kulpi, South 24 Parganas, the respondent no. 5 herein; such report was filed, wherefrom it appears that both the petitioner and the private respondents have encroached upon the P.W.D land. The representation of the petitioner dated November 02, 2021, praying removal of the said alleged encroachment, is pending consideration before different authorities including the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Road), Diamond Harbour, District: 24 Parganas (South), the respondent no. 3 herein. The said representation forms part of the writ petition being Annexure ‘P-4”. The respondent no. 3 is directed to consider and dispose of the said representation in accordance with law after giving the petitioner and all concerned an opportunity of hearing, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order. W.P.A. 18495 of 2021 is thus disposed of with the above terms without any order as to costs. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Biswajit Basu, J.) 2