ARJUN BHIMRAJ PANDIT AND OTHERS v. THE TAHSILDAR RAHURI AND OTHERS
WP/2669/2024 · 2025-08-06
Shri Rohit W Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34667 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34667 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
953.2669.2024-rasta case IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2669 OF 2024 Arjun Bhimraj Pandit And Others VERSUS The Tahsildar Rahuri And Others ... • Mr. H. V. Tungar, Advocate for the Petitioners • Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 • Mr. P. S. Dighe, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 to 10 ...
CORAM :
ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE :
AUGUST 06, 2025 O R D E R :
1. In view of judgment dated 04.08.2025, passed in Writ Petition No. 5074 of 2022 (Vimal w/o Bhausaheb Nebde Vs. Sub Divisional Officer & Ors.) and other connected matters, present writ petition stands
disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail alternate remedy of filing Civil Suit.
2. The petitioners may challenge the impugned orders in the said Civil Suit and/or seek adjudication of the controversy forming subject matter of the dispute on merits. It is also made clear that even order of temporary injunction passed by Civil Court prevails over orders passed by authorities under the provisions of the Mamlatdars’ Courts Act, 1906 and as such it will be open for the petitioners to file an application for temporary injunction as well.
3. Interim order dated 13.03.2024 is continued up to 15.10.2025. Needless to mention that the Court will decide the application for grant of temporary injunction, as also prayer for ad-interim order, on its own merits.
4. Period spent in prosecution of the present writ petition shall be excluded for computation of limitation in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
[ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.] komal kamble
2025:BHC-AUG:23830