2025:HHC:40982 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 18785 of 2025 Decided on : 01.12.2025 Tanish …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : M/s Sambhav Bhasin, Shivam Sharma and Muskan, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be served, in case, the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-14) be ordered to be decided within some reasonable time, by the Authority concerned. 3. Without going into the merits of the issue involved in this petition, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:40982 representation of the petitioner be decided by the Authority, within a period of two months from today, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court is not making any observation on the merits of the issue involved in this petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge December 01, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)