NAWNIKETAN CHANDRAVANSHI v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
MCC/740/2025 · 2025-07-23
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34664 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34664 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:35795
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 740 of 2025 1 - Nawniketan Chandravanshi S/o R.S. Chandravanshi, Aged About 50 Years Working As Computer Operator, R/o Post- B.M.Y. Charoda District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Yogyadutt Sharma S/o Late Shri Damodar Sharma, Aged About 42 Years Post- Computer Operator, R/o Sundar Nagar, P.S.- D.D. Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, Sector-19, North Block, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No. 1, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Sub-Division Officer, Public Works Department, Division No. 1, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Chopra, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.07.25 17:33:15 +0530
2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Order on Board 24/07/2025
1. This is an application for modification of the Order dated 04.07.2025 passed in WPS No. 6804/2025.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that due to clerical mistake in the writ petition, the address of the Respondent No. 2 to 4 have been disclosed as follows:-
2. Engineer in chief, Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, sector-19, North block, Atat Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
3. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No. 1, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
4. Sub-Division Officer, Public Works Department, Division No. 1, Raipur, Dist- Raipur (C.G.).
3. However, the correct description of the Respondent No. 2 to 4 are as follows:-
2. Engineer in chief, Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
3. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division- Vidhansabha, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub- Divisional Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) He would further submit that, merely change of the place of the office does not appear to be prejudice the respondent authorities, however, for just decision of the case, the modification in the impugned order is necessary, therefore, he has filed the present application for modification of the order dated 04.07.2025.
3
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel has opposed.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, it would deem appropriate to modify the order dated 04.07.2025. Therefore, the description of Respondent No. 2, 3 & 4 in the impugned
order be read as follows:-
“2. Engineer in chief, Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
3. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division- Vidhansabha, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub- Divisional Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)” in place of the earlier description of the Respondent No. 2, 3 & 4.
6. With the aforesaid modification, the present MCC is Allowed.
7. A copy of this order be placed in the record of the WPS No. 6804/2025
order dated 04.07.2025 and be read as a part thereof. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika