IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2131 of 2025 Date of Decision: 07.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Shri Kapil Tomer …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 06.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 03.10.2025, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Additional Advocate General. Moreover, factum with regard to compliance has been fairly acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner, who has also been supplied documents indicated hereinabove. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that financial benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid compliance, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from today. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 07, 2025 (sunil)