RITESH KUMAR SAINI SON OF SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18968/2024 · 2025-01-20
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34661 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34661 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2649] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18968/2024 Ritesh Kumar Saini Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Saini, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Samod Road, Nimadi, Hathnodo, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Urban Development And Housing, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Housing Commissioner, Rajasthan Housing Commissioner, Awas Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur- 302005 (Raj.)
3. Secretary, Rajasthan Housing Commissioner, Awas Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur- 302005 (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 20/01/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuq-&1@2012).
2. Heard.
3. This Court directs Respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 days, if filed, and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously
[2025:RJ-JP:2649] (2 of 2) [CW-18968/2024] as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated 19.02.2024.
4. In light of the aforestated, the respondents/Board are/is advised to consider position of vacancies under the OBC category and if the same exists, the candidature of the petitioner be considered for the same as per the merit scored by him and strictly in accordance with law. The present petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to approach this court again if grievance still survives after disposal of the representation and the aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand
disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Sunita/94