(1) 923.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 834 OF 2018 JITENDRA DHARAMCHAND SHETH THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY PRAKASH DHARAMCHAND SETH VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION LATUR THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER LATUR AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Veer h/f. Mrs. Dube Anjali (Bajpai) AGP for Respondent/s – State : Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 : Mr. Sirsat Ashok Bansi h/f. Mr. Patil Hanmant V. … CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 08.08.2025 PER COURT : 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who was the tenant in the suit property has vacated the suit premises and, therefore, nothing survives in the petition. He submits that the petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned Advocate Mr. Patil, appears for respondent no. 1. None for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. 3. In view of the above submissions made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner, the petition stands disposed of as as infructuous. ( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) spc/- 2025:BHC-AUG:21256