[2025:RJ-JP:785] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19250/2024 1. Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur-01 (Raj.) 2. General Manager, Telecom District, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. M/s Raj Solutions (India) Private Limited, Through Its Authorised Signatory Dr. Rajesh Jhajharia, Registered Office At 443, Vidhyut Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur-21, Rajasthan. 2. Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council, Jaipur, Division-I, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur-05, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19251/2024 1. Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur-01 (Raj.) 2. General Manager, Telecom District, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. M/s Raj Solutions (India) Private Limited, Through Its Authorised Signatory Dr. Rajesh Jhajharia, Registered Office At 443, Vidhyut Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur-21, Rajasthan. 2. Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council, Jaipur, Division-I, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur-05, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19252/2024 1. Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur-01 (Raj.) 2. General Manager, Telecom District Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. M/s Raj Solutions (India) Private Limited, Through Its Authorised Signatory Dr. Rajesh Jhajharia, Registered Office At 443, Vidhyut Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur-21, Rajasthan. 2. Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Facilitation [2025:RJ-JP:785] (2 of 2) [CW-19250/2024] Council, Jaipur, Division-I, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur-05, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Saharan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 07/01/2025 Since, the issue involved in these petitions is common, they are being tagged. These writ petitions are disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties: “(1) The MSME Facilitation Council shall first decide the issue of maintainability of the application(s) filed by the private respondent/applicant(s) in view of preliminary objection raised by the petitioners/non-applicants claiming that the applicant(s) does not fall within the definition of ‘supplier’ under Section 2(n) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order vide a reasoned and speaking order after giving the parties an opportunity of hearing.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/60-62