- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17713-DB CCC No. 1121 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND CCC NO. 1121 OF 2024 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. MR. C. BABU SON OF LATE CHINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 990/729, 13TH CROSS, NEAR BUS STAND, CHENNAKESHAVA NAGARA, HOSA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 100. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI N. S. SRIRAJ GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI KRISHNAMURTHY THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. …ACCUSED (BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA SMT. JYOTHI S. KEMPEGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT IN I.A.1/2024) Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17713-DB CCC No. 1121 of 2024 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ORDER THAT, ACCUSED IS GUILTY OF CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER DATED 24.06.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.16113/2024 (KLR-RES) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) The only direction in the order dated 24.06.2024 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.16113 of 2024 was to direct respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the complainant-petitioner dated 15.03.2024. 2. Alleging contempt of the above direction, the present proceedings are filed. 3. In course of the hearing today, learned Additional Government Advocate Mr. Naveen Chandrashekar for the respondents stated that the representation of the petitioner is - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17713-DB CCC No. 1121 of 2024 decided and in response to the representation, an endorsement dated 02.01.2025 is passed. The same figures on record along with the compliance affidavit. 4. In view of the above, nothing survives in the contempt petition as the direction to consider the representation has been complied with. 5. The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. It is observed that if the petitioner has any grievance about the endorsement, it is always open to the petitioner to institute appropriate independent proceedings in accordance with law, in respect of which, this court does not express any opinion on merits. In view of disposal of the petition, the interlocutory application would not survive and it stands accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE DDU/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50