1 2025:CGHC:33639 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7617 of 2025 1 - Smt. Kamini Son D/o Lt. Shri Hemnath Son, Aged About 39 Years Currently Working At Government Pre-Secondary School, Maroda Tank Bhilai, R/o Street 24, Quarter No. 14 B, Sector 10 Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Directorate of Public Instruction, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector/ Chairman, District Level Rationalization Committee, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer and Member Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh --- Respondents WPS No. 8009 of 2025 1 - Smt. Anju Kiran Mehto W/o Shri Ajay Kumar Aged About 39 Years Occupation Teacher, Science, L.B. Government Middle School Nardhi Patan, R/o Village Nardhi, / Patan Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 2 - Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchnalaya, Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector/ President, District Rationalization Committee, District Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer, Patan District Durg Chhattisgarh --- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. S.P. Kale, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Santosh Bharat Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 17-07-2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petitions filed by the petitioners against their transfer order(s) after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, were disposed of on 18-06-2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now these petitions have been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioners. 2. The counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07-07-2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw these petitions with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07- 07-2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07- 2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, both these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioners to move/pursue their representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07- 2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil