Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010538922024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4499 OF 2024 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act for willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble court passed in WP No. 4697 of 2024 dated 07-03-2024. Between:
1. M.V. Ravi Varma, S/o M.Yanadi Raju, aged about 56 years D.No.26-12-1575, Snehanagar, 2 Nellore District. 2. K.Sivajyothi, W/o M.,V.Ravi Varama, aged about 50 D.No.26-12-575, Snehanagar, 2'’'^ Line Nellore District. 3. M.Arunakumari, W/o M.V.Ramana RAju, aged about 53 D.No.26-12-1575, Snehanagar, 2 Nellore District. 4. S.Vankata Subbaiah, S/o Late Audeiah, aged about 78 years Budanam village, Chillakur Mandal, Tirupathi District R/o nd Line, B.V.Nagar, Nellore, SPSR years, R/o B.V.Nagar, Nellore, SPSR years, R/o Line, B.V.Nagar, Nellore, SPSR nd R/O ...Petitioners AND
1. Sri K Sreenivasulu, Tahsildar, Chillakur Mandal District. 2. Sri Subham Bansali, Joint Collector, Tirupathi. (R2 is Suo-motu impleaded as per Court Order dated 28.03.2025 in C.C.No.4499of2024) Chillakur, Tirupathi ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following ORDER:
APHC010538922024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4499/2024 Between:
1.M.V. RAVI VARMA, S/0 M.YANADI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/0 D.NO.26-12-1575, SNEHANAGAR, 2ND LINE NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. B.V.NAGAR, 2.K.SIVAJYOTHI, W/0 M.,V.RAVI VARAMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/0 D.NO.26-12-575, SNEHANAGAR, 2ND LINE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. B.V.NAGAR, 3.M.ARUNAKUMARI, W/0 M.V.RAMANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 53 R/0 D.NO.26-12-1575, SNEHANAGAR, 2ND LINE, YEARS, B.V.NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4.S.VANKATA SUBBAIAH, S/0 LATE AUDEIAH, AGED ABOUT 78 R/O BUDANAM VILLAGE, CHILLAKUR MANUAL, YEARS TIRUPATHI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.K SREENIVASULU, TAHSILDAR, CHILLAKUR MANUAL, CHILLAKUR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.
I 2.SRI SUBHAM BANSALI, JOINT COLLECTOR TIRUPATHI SUO-MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 28 03 2025 IN C C NO 4499 OF 2024 R2 IS ...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act for willful violation of the orders of this Honble court passed in WP No. 4697 of 2024 dated 07-03-2024, and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the Respondent in C.C.No. 4499 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner{S):
1.PGANGARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor{S):
1.J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following order: In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that, the orders disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. Sri K Sreenivasulu, Tahsildar, Chillakur Mandal, Chillakur, Tirupathi District. 2. Sri Subham Bansali, Joint Collector, Tirupathi. 3. One CC to Sri. P Ganga Rami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri. J Dileep Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies LRV sree
HIGH COURT DATED:18/07/2025 ORDER CC NO. 4499 OF 2024 10SEP 2075 j CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS