CWP-9806- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (251) Bharat Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, U.T. Chandigarh CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. 2. the Court. Even, on the represent the petitioner. 3. appears no justification in keeping the instant petition on board, indefinitely. 4. not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition anymore. 5. prosecution. September 09 Manpreet -2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, U.T. Chandigarh and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate for the respondents-U.T. Chandigarh. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) The instant writ petition is pending since the year 201 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, today in the Court. Even, on the previous occasions, no one has caused appearance to represent the petitioner. It is already 3.45 p.m. and Court time is almost over and appears no justification in keeping the instant petition on board, indefinitely. At this stage, this Court can safely presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition anymore. Consequently, the instant writ petition is prosecution. September 09, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9806-2019 Date of Decision : 09.09.2025 …Petitioner ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Chandigarh. The instant writ petition is pending since the year 2019. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, today in , no one has caused appearance to It is already 3.45 p.m. and Court time is almost over and there appears no justification in keeping the instant petition on board, indefinitely. ourt can safely presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition anymore. Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, today in , no one has caused appearance to there appears no justification in keeping the instant petition on board, indefinitely. ourt can safely presume that the petitioner is dismissed for want of MANPREET SINGH 2025.09.10 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment