1 2025:CGHC:5007 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1925 of 2018 1 - Ku. Dhaneshwari D/o Shri Surendra Kumar Aged About 14 Years R/o Village- Kodabhat, P.S.- Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. Applicant No.1 Is Minor, Represented By Her Father, Applicant No. 2 (Shri Surendra Kumar, S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Age About 37 Year, R/o Village Kodabhat, P.S.- Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Kodabhat, P.S.- Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House OfÏcer, Police Station- Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Jaikiran Khare S/o Shri Pawan Khare Aged About 27 Years Assistant Teacher Posted at Mahatama Jyoti Rao Fule M. School, Kodabhat, P.S.- Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. R/o Village- Kodabhat, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Kushwaha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 28.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. D. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the respondents. RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN Date: 2025.01.29 14:31:51 +0530 2 2. None appears on behalf of petitioners nor any representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioners when the case is called out. 3. This instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for record (if necessary), set-aside the order dated 20-08- 2018 (Annexure A-6), passed by Special Judge (Atrocities), Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) in Special Sessions Case No. 31/2018 and to pass any appropriate order/direction regarding proper enquiry of such tampered document “Dakhil Kharij” of the Applicant No.1 on which Id. Court below has placed reliance and granted bail to the Non- Applicant No.2, in the interests of justice.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the trial has already been concluded against the petitioner. Therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 5. In view of the above submission, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.-- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan