Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34623 (PNJ)

TAMANNA BABBAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/9170/2025 · 2025-04-01

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-9170-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9170-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.04.2025 Tamanna Babbar ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate, for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3-HSVP. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to hand over the physical possession of the Commercial Booth/building No.18, 19, 20, 21 and Residential Plot No.3 in Sector 24-25A, Urban Estate, Gurugram II, after completion of development works/basic amenities, including road, street light, Sewerage, Parking etc. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to her grievance, the petitioner has already made representations dated 10.12.2024 and 01.02.2025 (Annexures AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.04 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-9170-2025 (O&M) -2- P-11 and P-12 respectively), followed by reminder dated 05.02.2025 (Annexure P-13) to the competent authority, but no action has been taken thereon till date. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3-HSVP, submits that the said representations shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Estate Officer II, HSVP, Gurugram (competent authority), to look into the pending representations/reminder dated 10.12.2024, 01.02.2025 and 05.02.2025 (Annexures P-11 to P-13 respectively) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 01.04.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.04 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document