HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1177 of 2024 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the revisionist has been filed in Court today, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Sunil Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the revisionist, Shri Narayan Singh(Kushwaha), learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA appearing for the State-opposite party no.1 and perused the record. 3. The instant criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 18.01.2024 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Etah in Criminal Misc. Case No. 34 of 2018 (Smt. Gajala and another Vs. Khalid Hashmi), under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Etah, whereby the revisionist was directed to pay Rs.9,000/- per month to the opposite party no.2 from the date of application and and Rs.5000/- per month to the opposite party no.3, as interim maintenance, from the date of the application (till he attains the age of majority). 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist states that on 13.09.2025 a compromise took place between the parties before the Mediation Centre, Etah, which is evident from the mediation report dated 13.09.2025. Through the said compromise, the revisionist has paid Rs.32,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Two Lacs) as permanent alimony to the opposite party no.2. Learned counsel for the revisionist further submits that on the basis of the compromise dated 13.09.2025, the proceedings of Case No. 50 of 2025 (Gajala Parveen Vs. Khalid Hashimi) pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Etah has been decided and the file was consigned to record. Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Sunil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Narayan Singh(Kushwaha) Khalid Hashmi .....Revisionist(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA appearing for the State-opposite party no.1 could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, compromise has been taken place between the parties, the opposite party no.2 has received permanent alimony of Rs.32,00,000/-, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, accordingly the instant criminal revision is allowed in terms of the aforesaid compromise dated 13.09.2025 and the judgment and order dated 18.01.2024 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Etah in Criminal Misc. Case No. 34 of 2018 (Smt. Gajala and another Vs. Khalid Hashmi), under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Etah, is set aside and quashed. 7. Parties to bear their own cost. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 Prajapati RK CRLR No. 1177 of 2024 2 (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad