Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
rv
0. APHC010537362018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25375 OF 2018 Between: B.Nagaraju, S/o. late Ramakrishna Rao, aged about 63 years, Hotel Karanth, 33-1-55, Allipuram, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, Andhra Pradesh. 4. G V Ramana, s/o. not known. Aged 47 years. Inspector of Police. II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam City. 5. The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam (Urban), Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, represented by its Zonal Commissioner, Zone-Ill, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. 7. Gompa Surya Prakesh, s/o. late Dalinaidu, aged 67 years, r/o.D.No.26-15-
149. Bowdara Road, Visakhapatnam. Andhra Pradesh. 8. Gompa Dallinaidu, s/o. Surya Prakash Rao, aged 44 years, r/o.D.No.26-15-
149. Main Road, AVN College Down. Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. 9. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 3'"'^ respondent dated 25-06-2018 as illegal, arbitrary, ultravires the powers conferred by law, amounting to usurpation of role of Civil Court, highly arbitrary, malicious, motivated by mala tides and extraneous considerations and unconstitutional and set aside the same and consequently direct the 9th respondent to initiate ' disciplinary action against the 3'"^ respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order of the 3'^'^ respondent dated 25-06-2018. pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondents 1, 2 & 3 & 9: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:
APHC010537362018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25376/7018 Between:
1.BJSIAGARAJU, S/0. LATE RAMAKRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 KARANTH YEARS, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. HOTEL 33-1-55, ALLIPURAM, ...PETITIONER AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN POLICE STATION VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.G V RAMANA, S/0. NOT KNOWN, AGED 47 YEARS, INSPECTOR OF POLICE. II TOWN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 5.THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM (URBAN), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6.GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS ZONAL COMMISSIONER, ZONE-III VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7.GOMPA SURYA PRAKESH, S/0. LATE DALINAIDU, AGED 67 YEARS R/O.D.NO.26-15-149. VISAKHAPATNAM. ANDHRA PRADESH. 8.GOMPA DALLINAIDU, S/0. SURYA PRAKASH RAO, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.26-15-149. MAIN ROAD, AVN COLLEGE DOWN. VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 9.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. BOWDARA ROAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 3'^'^
2 respondent dated 25-06-2018 as illegal, arbitrary, ultravires the powers conferred by law, amounting to usurpation of role of Civil Court, highly arbitrary, malicious, motivated by mala fides and extraneous considerations and unconstitutional and set aside the same and consequently direct the 9th respondent to initiate disciplinary action against the 3rd respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
" ... to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 3^ respondent dated 25.06.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, ultravires the powers conferred by law amounting to usurpation of role of Civil Court highly arbitrary malicious motivated by mala fides and extraneous considerations and unconstitutional and set aside the same and consequently, direct the 9' respondent to initiate disciplinary action against the 3'^'* respondent and pass
2. Heard Sri Srinivas Rao Bodduluri, learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents. Perused the material on record.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on Written Instructions dated 24.07.2018, would submit that there are civil disputes pending between thq parties and that the Police never interfered in their civil disputes. Learnec} Assistant Government Pleader would submit that this Writ Petition may b^
disposed of by passing appropriate directions to the respondent-Police.
3
"t*
4.
Learned counsel for Petitioner would subnnity recording the said submission this writ Petition may be disposed of.
5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M.SURYANADHA REDDY DEPUTY REGI R //TRUE COPY// SECTfON OFFICER To, Pradesh, Department of Home, Secretary, State of Andhra Velagapudi, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Secretariat,
2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh.
3. The Inspector of Police, II Town Andhra Pradesh.
4. G V Ramana Town
5. The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Pradesh. Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, , s/o. not known. Aged 47 years. Inspector of Police. Police Station, Visakhapatnam City (Urban), Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Visakhapatnam Municipal Greater
6. The Zonal Commissioner Corporation, Zone-Ill, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Andhra Pradesh State, Mangalagiri,
7. The Director General of Police Guntur District.
8. One CC to Sri Srinivasa
9. Two CCs to GP for Home, Two CD Copies Rao Bodduluri, Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
10. RAM
HIGH COURT . DATED: 17/07/2025
ORDER WP.NO. 25375 OF 2018 5( 3 0 JUL 2025 )% S^nrenlSectjai^/ 9 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS