Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34619 (KAR)

SMT. NINGAMMA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MFA.CROB/147/2023 · 2025-01-06

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 147 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SMT. NINGAMMA W/O SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O JAMPALEGOWDANADODDI, KASABA HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. ..CROSS OBJECTOR (BY SRIYUTHS. P. MAHESHA, PREREET JAIN, NIKITHA MAHESH, ADVOCATES) AND: 1 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, KAVERI BHAWANA, BENGALURU. 2 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, KAVERI BHAWANA BENGALURU. 3 . THE HOUSING COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, KAVERI BHAWANA BENGALURU. MFA CROB. No.147/2023 ---------------------------- 2 4 . THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA. 5 . THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER BTS BUS STOP COMPLEX, 2ND FLOOR, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU. 6 . THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S BUILDING, BANGALORE. 7 . THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU. ..RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal Cross Objection U/O 41 Rule 22 R/W Sec. 74 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013, against the Judgment and Award dated 30.03.2022 passed in LAC No.41/2018 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ramanagara, allowing the reference petition filed U/S 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. This Miscellaneous First Appeal Cross Objection is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: MFA CROB. No.147/2023 ---------------------------- 3 ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the appellant. The matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. To show one indulgence, two weeks time is granted to comply the office objections, failing in which, appeal shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.06.01.2025, not complied with. Hence, Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: AR R By: RM C By: STE