Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34617 (MAD)

RAJENDIRAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/10392/2025 · 2025-04-02

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/6 WP No. 10392 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 10392 of 2025 and WMP Nos. 11683, 11684 & 11685 of 2025 Rajendiran Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madhuranthagam, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Tahsildar Cheyyur Tahsildar Office, Cheyyur, Chengalpattu District. 4.The Sub Registrar Cheyyur Sub Registrar Office, Cheyyur, Chengalpattu District 5.Kanniga Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 WP No. 10392 of 2025 PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, direct the 3rd respondent to call for the entire record relating the impugned patta No.1939 endorsement 2025/ 0103/ 35/ 411447 dated 21.01.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent to quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein to reissue patta in name of the petitioner late father name to the and comprised in Punjai Survey No.86, admeasuring to the extent of 0.55.50 ares situated in Kadalur village, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Venkatesan For Respondent(s): P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the patta issued in favour of the 5 th respondent by the 3 rd respondent in Patta No.1939, pertaining to the subject property. 2.Heard Mr.A.Venkatesan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 4. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/6 WP No. 10392 of 2025 3.In the considered view of this Court, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the patta issued in the name of the 5 th respondent, the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy by way of an appeal under Section 12 of the Patta Pass Book Act. In fact, the petitioner has made a representation in this regard before the 2 nd respondent on 03.03.2025. Since the same is pending before the 2 nd respondent, it will be more appropriate to issue direction to the 2 nd respondent to deal with the representation/appeal filed by the petitioner and pass orders. 4.In the light of the above discussion, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2 nd respondent to deal with the representation/appeal given by the petitioner on 03.03.2025, on its own merits and in accordance with law after affording opportunity to the 5 th respondent and final orders shall be passed, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5.The petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the 2 nd respondent along with a copy of the representation dated 03.03.2025 and all the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/6 WP No. 10392 of 2025 relevant document and also a copy of this order. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 02-04-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/6 WP No. 10392 of 2025 To 1.The District Collector Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madhuranthagam, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Tahsildar Cheyyur Tahsildar Office, Cheyyur, Chengalpattu District. 4.The Sub Registrar Cheyyur Sub Registrar Office, Cheyyur, Chengalpattu District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6/6 WP No. 10392 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ssr WP No. 10392 of 2025 02-04-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis