Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.1829 of 2024 1) Amara Chandra Dash ..... Petitioners 2) Sandhyarani Dash 3) Shantilata Dash 4) Malati Padhi @ Malatilata Das 5) Satyajyoti Panigrahi 6) Jaharana Panigrahi Represented By Adv. - Bini Mishra -versus- 1) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties 2) Satyabhama Dash Represented By Adv. –Mr. U.R.Jena, A.G.A. Satyabrata Senapati,animesh Mohanty CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA Order No. ORDER 18.08.2025 04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners as well as learned counsel for the Opposite Parties. 3. Considering the fact that the dispute involved in the present application is a family dispute among the family members, the learned trial court shall make an endeavour to send the parties to District Mediation Centre for an amicable resolution of the dispute. In the event the matter is not resolved through the mechanism of mediation, it is open to the learned court below to proceed in the Page 2 of 2. matter in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the CRLMC stands disposed of. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Rubi