Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34614 (BOM)

SUNITA ASHOK KADAM v. RETURNING OFFICER ELECTION FOR VILLAGE PANCHAYAT BEED AND OTHERS

WP/14430/2017 · 2025-07-02

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

123-WP-14430-17+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 123 WRIT PETITION NO. 14430 OF 2017 SUNITA ASHOK KADAM VERSUS RETURNING OFFICER ELECTION FOR VILLAGE PANCHAYAT BEED AND OTHERS ... Mr. Tope Sambhaji S., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. D. R.Korade, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. S. T. Shelke, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. Saurabh P. Tandale h/for Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for Respondent No.3 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14431 OF 2017 .… CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 02.07.2025 PER COURT :- . Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner submits that by efflux of time, prayers in writ petitions do not survive. 2. Hence, writ petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. [ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] HRJadhav 1 of 1