[2025:RJ-JP:36045] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8364/2024 1. Vijay Singh S/o Suraj Bhan Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o 29, Janak Puri, Imliwala Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Neeta Singh W/o Anil Singh D/o Suraj Bhan Singh, Aged About 54 Years, At Present R/o Nspc House, Champa, Distt. Champa ( Himachal Pradesh). 3. Mallika Singh D/o Joginder Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o A-301, New I.t. Officers Colony,dindosi Bus Depot, Samore, Goregaon, East Mumbai ( Maharashtra). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Mahesh Agarwal S/o Shanti Lal Agarwal, Aged About 60 Years, B-1, New Light Yojana, Tonk Road, Jaipur ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Hasan Sr. Counsel with Mr. Fahad Hasan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 08/09/2025 Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that the agreement to sale dated 04.07.2022 and 14.09.2022 were cancelled vide registered notices dated 06.06.2023 and 20.06.2023 respectively. Hence, on that point, the FIR has been lodged by the complainant. It has been argued that the dispute is primarily of civil nature which has been tried to give a colour of criminal offence, to pressurize the petitioners to sell their lands. [2025:RJ-JP:36045] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8364/2024] Learned Public Prosecutor submits that investigation in the FIR is undergoing and petitioners have not turned up for investigation. Considering the dispute between the parties, in respect of sale and purchase of immovable properties, petitioners may appear before the Investigating Officer on 23/24.09.2025, however, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. In case, Investigating Officer deems it necessary that custodial investigation of the petitioners is required, he shall issue an advance notice of 15 days upon petitioners, explaining the reasons for necessity of their arrest. As per records, notice to respondent No.2 has been served but no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent. Hence, service stands complete. List the matter after six weeks along with investigation report. (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/182