NAGIREDDY MALLAREDDY v. SRI BUDITHI RAJASEKHAR,IAS
CC/5782/2023 · 2025-04-17
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34604 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34604 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010536822023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: Nagireddy Mallareddy Sri Budithi Rajasekhar Ias and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BATHALA RAMESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following: ORDER This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 10.08.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition vide W.P.No.11572 of 2023.
Sri Bathala Ramesh, learned counsel for the pe the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case, had been complied with.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5782/2023 ...PETITIONER AND Sri Budithi Rajasekhar Ias and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 10.08.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition vide W.P.No.11572 of 2023. Sri Bathala Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case, had IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR(S) This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 10.08.2023 passed titioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case, had
In view the above submission, nothing remains for adjudication and this Contempt Case can be closed.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J RR