Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34599 (JHR)

SHANKAR DAYAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/949/2025 · 2025-11-25

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:35155 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 949 of 2025 --- 1. Shankar Dayal S/o Sri Ramautar Sao, R/o Flat No. 504, Palash Apartment, Modi Compound, PO & PS Lalpur, Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. Manoj Kumar, S/o Late Dularchand Sao, R/o West End Park, PO Hehal Ratu Road, PS Pandra, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. Alka Sinha, D/o Late Upendra Narayan, R/o Near Kali Mandir, Kusum Kunj, Ratu Block Road, PO & PS Ratu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 4. Sushma Sinha, D/o late Shyam Deo Narain Sinha, R/o Flat no. 1/A, Block-F, Jai Shree Green City, Argora-Pundag Road, PO Doranda, PS Argora, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 5. Kumudini Sinku, S/o Late Krishna Sinku, R/o Flat no. 202, 2nd Floor, Sopan Apartment, Lowadih, PO & PS Lowadih, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 6. Deepak Kumar Verma, S/o Suresh Ram, R/o New Nagara Toli, Near Kasturi Apartment, PO Lalpur, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 7. Amar Kant Thakur, S/o Late Rajni Kant Thakur, R/o Flat no. 401, Lotus Apartment, Argora-Pundag Road, PO Doranda, PS Argora, District Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Amitabh Kaushal S/o not known, presently posted as the Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagarnnathpur, Ranchi … … Opposite parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Ms. Shweta Suman, Advocate For the Opposite party : Ms. Ruchi Mukti, AC to AAG IA --- 3/25.11.2025 Ms. Shweta Suman, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order dated 19.07.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 2711 of 2023 has been complied with and the claim of the petitioners has been rejected. Consequently, this contempt application stands disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the appropriate forum, if they are aggrieved with the order of rejection. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) R Shekhar Cp 2