IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 20482 of 2025 Decided on: 24th December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suman Lata …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Shivangi, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be content if the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authorities to decide her representation dated 24.11.2025 (Annexure P-12) in a time bound manner in view of the law 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 laid down by this Court in LPA No. 23/2009, titled as State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Jagdev Katoch & Ors. decided along with connected matters on 07.01.2020. 3. Prayer, being innocuous, is considered and allowed. 4. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today by passing a detailed and reasoned order strictly in terms of the aforesaid judgment. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Sushil Kukreja) December 24, 2025 Judge Rohit