Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34582 (RAJ)

ADITYA @ BHUPENDRA @ GUDDU S/O GYAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/8366/2024 · 2025-01-29

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4089] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8366/2024 Aditya @ Bhupendra @ Guddu S/o Gyan Singh, R/o Village Bharangarpur, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. .....Respondent 2. Rajveer Singh S/o Khajjo, R/o Char Thok, Jaghina District Bharatpur (Raj). ----Complainant/Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan For Respondent(s) For State : : Mr. Brijendra Singh Kachhawa for Mr. Yogesh Singhal Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 29/01/2025 1. The present criminal misc. petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash and set aside the impugned F.I.R. No.306/2021 dated 02.11.2021 registered with the Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Bharatpur for the Office under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC and the entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case No.132/2023; State vs. Uday Singh @ Uddal & Ors. pending before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.3, Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC qua him. [2025:RJ-JP:4089] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-8366/2024] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have entered into a compromise and no purpose will be served in continuing the criminal proceedings against the present petitioner. Counsel also submits that the complainant has settled his dispute only qua the present petitioner. 3. Counsel for the complainant does not dispute the fact of compromise and on the instructions of the complainant submits that the complainant has no objection if the impugned F.I.R. and the entire criminal proceedings against qua the present petitioner are quashed and set aside. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and perused the relevant material available on record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the counsels appearing for the parties, so also the fact of compromise arrived at between the parties and that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], this Court feels that the impugned F.I.R. is liable to be quashed and set aside. 6. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the impugned F.I.R. No.306/2021 dated 02.11.2021 registered with the Police Station Udhyog Nagar, Bharatpur for the Office under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC and the entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case No.132/2023; State vs. Uday Singh @ Uddal & Ors pending before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.3, Bharatpur for the offence [2025:RJ-JP:4089] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-8366/2024] under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC are hereby quashed and set aside only qua the present petitioner. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /453